Editorial Note
This article reports on federal criminal proceedings involving former Evanston/Skokie School District 65 Superintendent Devon Horton and three former district vendors. Unlike an unresolved allegation, the October 13 development involved two defendants entering guilty pleas and admitting conduct described in federal plea agreements.
The defendants' admissions should be distinguished from allegations concerning unrelated conduct or individuals. Criminal sentencing has not yet occurred, and the exact penalties remain subject to judicial determination. This article is for educational and informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
The Bottom Line
Two former vendors of Evanston/Skokie School District 65 in Illinois pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud charges on October 13, 2026, admitting that they paid kickbacks to former Superintendent Devon Horton in exchange for his assistance obtaining district contracts.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Antonio Ross and Alfonzo Lewis admitted paying cash kickbacks from consulting contracts awarded during Horton's tenure.
The new guilty pleas bring the total number of defendants who have pleaded guilty in the federal investigation to four.
The case has particular significance for Georgia because Horton later served as superintendent of the DeKalb County School District.
The investigation demonstrates how corruption involving school procurement can divert resources from educational priorities and undermine public confidence in district leadership.
What Happened?
In an October 13 announcement, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois confirmed that Antonio Ross and Alfonzo Lewis pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud charges.
Both men admitted that they paid Horton kickbacks in exchange for his efforts to steer school district contracts to businesses they controlled.
Federal prosecutors stated that Antonio Ross received approximately $119,500 in district contracts and paid Horton at least $41,900 in cash from the proceeds.
Lewis obtained approximately $24,000 in district contracts and paid Horton at least $6,000 in cash kickbacks.
The vendors also admitted that their businesses failed to perform some services for which they invoiced the school district.
The investigation involved additional financial activity associated with another vendor, Samuel Ross.
According to the Justice Department, Samuel Ross's business obtained approximately $124,500 from District 65 for purported loss-prevention services, and Horton admitted receiving an additional $30,000 in kickbacks connected to that vendor.
Horton pleaded guilty earlier in October to federal wire fraud, embezzlement, and tax charges.
Samuel Ross pleaded guilty to wire fraud in September.
All four defendants have now entered guilty pleas in the federal investigation.
Why the Georgia Connection Matters
Horton previously led District 65 in Illinois before later serving as superintendent of DeKalb County School District in Georgia.
That career progression makes the case relevant to educational communities in both states.
However, an important distinction must be maintained: the conduct described in the October 13 federal announcement concerned Horton's work and the contracts associated with Evanston/Skokie School District 65.
The announcement does not establish that the same kickback conduct occurred in DeKalb County.
Horton has also faced separate legal allegations in Georgia, but those matters should not be combined with the Illinois federal guilty pleas or treated as part of the same criminal findings.
The central development in this article is the federal investigation and the additional admissions by District 65 vendors.
Understanding the Federal Fraud Case
The criminal proceedings involve an alleged procurement system in which businesses obtained contracts with assistance from the superintendent and then paid him portions of the resulting proceeds.
The October guilty pleas establish that participating defendants admitted specified conduct.
Wire fraud generally concerns a scheme to defraud involving interstate wire communications. Embezzlement and tax offenses involve separate legal elements.
Because the defendants have pleaded guilty, the case has progressed beyond the allegation stage. However, sentencing remains a separate judicial proceeding.
A guilty plea does not establish that every district employee, school board member, or vendor was involved in wrongdoing.
The Justice Department's announcement identifies the defendants and their admitted conduct; broader institutional responsibility requires separate evidence.
What This Means for School District Financial Oversight
Public school districts manage significant budgets, often involving technology, professional development, consulting, transportation, construction, and specialized educational services.
Contracts for these services can be necessary, but they also create opportunities for abuse when decision-making authority is concentrated or oversight is ineffective.
Districts should maintain clear procurement rules, competitive purchasing procedures where required, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and independent review of financial transactions.
Contract managers should be able to verify whether purchased services were delivered before payments are approved.
School boards should receive sufficiently detailed financial information to question unusual spending patterns without interfering with routine administrative operations.
The District 65 investigation highlights the importance of examining both contract approvals and the actual performance of vendors.
A valid invoice or signed agreement does not, by itself, prove that services were properly delivered.
Five Financial Controls School Boards Should Review
1. Vendor selection: Are contracts awarded through transparent procedures consistent with state law and district policy?
2. Conflict-of-interest disclosures: Are senior administrators required to disclose relevant personal and financial relationships?
3. Service verification: Who independently confirms that services were delivered before an invoice is paid?
4. Payment monitoring: Are unusual contract patterns, duplicate invoices, and repeated awards to connected vendors reviewed?
5. Reporting protections: Can employees report potential fraud without facing retaliation for good-faith concerns?
These are general governance recommendations, not findings that District 65 lacked any particular control.
What This Does Not Mean
The federal guilty pleas do not prove that all contracts awarded during Horton's leadership were fraudulent.
They also do not establish that employees or administrators who worked with the defendants knowingly participated in the scheme.
Separate criminal proceedings and allegations involving Horton should be evaluated independently.
Any assessment of districtwide oversight failures would require additional documentation beyond the plea announcements.
What Happens Next?
Federal sentencing hearings are scheduled for several defendants.
According to the Justice Department, Horton is scheduled for sentencing on January 5, 2027.
Lewis is scheduled for January 25, 2027, and Antonio Ross for March 10, 2027.
At the time of the October 13 announcement, a sentencing date for Samuel Ross had not yet been set.
The potential statutory maximum for the wire fraud charges is not a prediction of the actual sentence.
The court will determine sentencing outcomes using the applicable legal standards and case-specific factors.
Why This Matters
Public education funding is intended to support students, educational employees, infrastructure, and learning services.
When senior leadership participates in a contract kickback scheme, the consequences extend beyond direct financial losses.
Confidence in district leadership, vendor relationships, and public financial stewardship can deteriorate.
The strongest institutional response is not simply to condemn corruption after it is discovered, but to establish procurement safeguards that make improper transactions easier to detect and harder to conceal.
Key Takeaways
- Antonio Ross and Alfonzo Lewis pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud charges on October 13, 2026.
- The defendants admitted paying kickbacks to former Superintendent Devon Horton.
- Antonio Ross obtained approximately $119,500 in district contracts and paid at least $41,900 in kickbacks.
- Lewis obtained approximately $24,000 in contracts and paid at least $6,000.
- Horton and another vendor had already entered guilty pleas.
- Horton subsequently served as superintendent in DeKalb County, Georgia.
- The federal announcement concerns Illinois district contracts, not a finding of the same misconduct in Georgia.
- Sentencing proceedings remain pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Devon Horton?
Devon Horton is a former superintendent of Evanston/Skokie School District 65 in Illinois who later served as superintendent of DeKalb County School District in Georgia.
Have the defendants been convicted?
All four defendants in the federal investigation have entered guilty pleas. Sentencing proceedings remain pending.
How much money was involved?
The Justice Department described multiple district contracts and cash kickbacks, including at least $41,900 paid by Antonio Ross and at least $6,000 by Alfonzo Lewis.
Did the scheme occur in Georgia?
The October 13 federal announcement concerns Evanston/Skokie District 65 in Illinois. Horton's later Georgia employment does not establish that the same scheme occurred there.
Final Thoughts
The District 65 corruption investigation demonstrates the importance of accountability at the highest levels of educational administration.
Financial safeguards must be strong enough to operate even when individuals with significant authority participate in procurement decisions.
As sentencing approaches, districts nationwide can use the documented admissions in this case to reassess contract oversight, independent verification, and mechanisms for identifying financial abuse before it undermines student resources.
Support New To Education
New To Education covers educational accountability, public policy, and the administration of schools and learning institutions.
https://newtoeducation.com/support-us
Related Articles
Former DeKalb County Schools Superintendent Devon Horton Indicted on Aggravated Assault, Child-Cruelty Charges
This earlier New To Education article concerns a separate Georgia criminal matter, not the Illinois kickback guilty pleas.
United ISD Board Member Faces Complaint Over Alleged Influence on Contracts, Hiring, and Vendors
Sources
U.S. Department of Justice — Federal Investigation Into Kickback Scheme at Evanston/Skokie School District 65 Results in Two More Guilty Pleas (October 13, 2026)
